Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 07:33:31 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PowerMac G4 graphics issue Message-ID: <20140330073331.GB30090@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140329100217.505671e8@zhabar.att.net> References: <20081108120019.440D2106570D@hub.freebsd.org> <762295.44650.qm@web33105.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20140329105152.GA73812@FreeBSD.org> <20140329124227.GA22005@FreeBSD.org> <CAHSQbTAy89HtJHfq1CmDGyygNwOVSh_19NnESgjvX1WhpdMDDQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140329164046.GA7227@FreeBSD.org> <20140329100217.505671e8@zhabar.att.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote: > On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:40:46 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > HW accel seems to work: X11 overall feels quite fast; glxinfo reports: > > > > direct rendering: Yes > > server glx vendor string: SGI > > server glx version string: 1.4 I guess I spoke too soon; something is not quite right here, running Quake2 in GL mode clearly indicated that hw accel does not work. I've also found these lines in the Xorg.0.log: [ 1679.643] (EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/local/lib/dri/r200_dri.so failed (Cannot open "/usr/local/lib/dri/r200_dri.so") [ 1679.643] (EE) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering [ 1680.188] (II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized swrast [ 1680.188] (II) GLX: Initialized DRISWRAST GL provider for screen 0 That's true, I don't have r200_dri.so there, but I do have radeon_dri.so; why X is trying to load r200 one? > > glxgears spin at ~53 FPS. I haven't benchmarked Quake yet. ;-) > > Awesome! I've never had success with DRI on PowerPC. I wish I had! ;-) I've tried glxgears on my laptop (2.26GHz Dothan with GMA900 video) -- it yielded almost 900 FPS. Now that's closer to really being hardware accelerated. > I think X is just setting it to a square that's big enough to hold the > current screen. That's not always the case, though, as on my G5 I see: There are a bunch of lines like these in the log: [ 1678.663] (II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "416x312" (vrefresh out of range) [ 1678.663] (II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "1400x1050" (hsync out of range) And then: [ 1678.663] (II) RADEON(0): Printing probed modes for output DVI-1 [ 1678.663] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1024x768"x60.0 65.00 1024 1048 1184 1344 768 771 777 806 -hsync -vsync (48.4 kHz d) [ 1678.663] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600"x60.3 40.00 800 840 968 1056 600 601 605 628 +hsync +vsync (37.9 kHz d) [ 1678.663] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480"x59.9 25.18 640 656 752 800 480 490 492 525 -hsync -vsync (31.5 kHz d) [ 1678.663] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "512x384"x60.0 32.50 512 524 592 672 384 385 388 403 doublescan -hsync -vsync (48.4 kHz d) [ 1678.663] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "400x300"x60.3 20.00 400 420 484 528 300 300 302 314 doublescan +hsync +vsync (37.9 kHz d) [ 1678.664] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "320x240"x60.1 12.59 320 328 376 400 240 245 246 262 doublescan -hsync -vsync (31.5 kHz d) I'll see if I can force the correct resolution via xorg.conf or something... ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140330073331.GB30090>