Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:23:31 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Needs triage .. Message-ID: <20140906230043.H58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20140906125502.GA1892@elch.exwg.net> References: <20140906221516.Q58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20140906125502.GA1892@elch.exwg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Ian Smith (smithi@nimnet.asn.au): > > > Are these just getting auto-assigned to stable@? Can anyone play? :) > > The submitter explicitly adds stable@ to the bug's Cc list. Yes, and this submitter hasn't posted in the dozen lists I take, since May anyway. This may save someone having to assign a bug, but perhaps one shouldn't earn the 'mayCC' bit until some N>0 have been assigned? > But anyways, looking at the amount of panics he reports, most of which > happen on rather trivial actions (as far as I can tell from my sampling > of reports), this looks like bad hardware. > If anyone with a hat could tell the sasamotikomi? I'm more concerned about process (vs PRs) and bulk spam potential than the reporting methods of any one submitter; bugzilla is overall cool. cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140906230043.H58647>