Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:15:28 +0200 From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> To: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> Cc: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpepflashplayer on chromium? Message-ID: <20140908061528.GP57121@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJuc1zPHOd2=vxuZCReQ6_z0E_GVo3-mxjT%2B4136GAZ-ZFBnvw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJuc1zPHOd2=vxuZCReQ6_z0E_GVo3-mxjT%2B4136GAZ-ZFBnvw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BfIB/hDtUWEgpOfz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:08:30AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Hi, >=20 > With latest release of chromium, www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 no longer > works. However, I note that Google have now introduced > libpepflashplayer to handle Flash content. Is this part of the > chromium source-tree or would this involve introducing a separate > port? Unfortunately the libpepflashplayer.so file is a shared object for Linux, so it doesn't work out of the box. But maybe it could work with nspluginwrapper? But AFAIK nspluginwrapper is for NPAPI Plugins which no longer work on Chromium > 35.x --BfIB/hDtUWEgpOfz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUDUmAXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1t79oH/0jbElGPQymARZwKZgTYLNdU GlxzUdwnld4xUJxoUArr9H8Z3gLsrLeXSAb/HG2876Ml7DmTzlWHTq4LKFolx3R8 wFDQEfWtECZgoxzx/BZfddWNBkosTkKcI+JZWnVgZLCnaBO0g02xh1fp9A4fMzrf FPCdRjbpde7gKuuuVzA2SWUjETNPw/iqILx5SXmqlZjxVJkqdNwTgY0VqZGbKFjz RZbn+dUjVKYNFfJB8H8ss/Cw/kXM6VYJx+imZ7v8NxC9Wf4b710myOHmnuv2Lnbg 9651ea4cKiFXk02ThvgmkGL0doI4LJZv0O+wqIt1RaVuYpB4qHJ99mNltU4p6eM= =kwhn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BfIB/hDtUWEgpOfz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140908061528.GP57121>