Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 11:09:40 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Tiwei Bie <btw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Finish the task 'sysctl reporting current working directory' Message-ID: <20141103090940.GI53947@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20141103084129.GF29497@dft-labs.eu> References: <1414987325-23280-1-git-send-email-btw@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <20141103051908.GC29497@dft-labs.eu> <20141103064052.GA1739@freebsd> <5457394E.4050905@freebsd.org> <20141103084129.GF29497@dft-labs.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:41:29AM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:14:06PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > why are you using a fixed sysctl MIB number? > > I thought we were moving towards dynamic sysctls when we add new ones. > > > > We are? KERN_PROC_* seems to be a complete list with SIGTRAMP added last > year. > > I guess we can do it with OID_AUTO, if there will be any need we can > switch it back to a static var. I am very curious how would you make kern.proc.cwd auto, while still using kern.proc leaf. And more important question is, why ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141103090940.GI53947>