Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:46:16 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Process reapers Message-ID: <20141203104616.GQ97072@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <08032C01-B594-478D-927E-D7E52920ABEE@me.com> References: <20141201185237.GC97072@kib.kiev.ua> <2BBA8329-C8F4-452D-B6C2-E129FCD6D666@me.com> <20141202093109.GG97072@kib.kiev.ua> <08032C01-B594-478D-927E-D7E52920ABEE@me.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:46:27AM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote: > On Dec 2, 2014, at 01:31, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > I could rename p1 to something else, but also short, since LIST_* > > constructs are long and clumsy. Might be, s/p1/rp/ ? > > Yes, that works as well. Ok, I renamed p1 to reap. Does anybody have any non-formal comments about patch ? I would go as far as to say that the implementation details are really not that critical for the proposal. I am much more worried about the API design and its usefullness,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141203104616.GQ97072>