Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:08:04 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> Cc: ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> References: <mailman.1.1420977600.74846.freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <CAG=rPVcTsT2izsmdGMJtD6RgRJ3CwfZg1vN6nC%2BvRMYEQ8iPhA@mail.gmail.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > No disputing that, just thinking, is FreeBSD being driven by user need, > financial contributer need, developer need, security need, making things > 'better' or just by people wanting to make their mark in a warped sense > of "it'll all get better"...? Probably by developer *capacity* (not need) and fire-fighting, like most IT stuff 8-( -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150112130804.GD44537>