Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:31:45 -0800
From:      Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf@gmail.com>
To:        Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PowerMac G5 quad-core, CPU A1 DIODE TEMP: 90.8 C (for example): How to handle? [more data]
Message-ID:  <20150116233145.6708cc6f@zhabar.attlocal.net>
In-Reply-To: <0631235D-A505-4C37-87D7-6F46A14552AB@dsl-only.net>
References:  <42CF1E40-5BD5-4B00-86E9-C62AEB9B8B93@dsl-only.net> <15A6D627-9DC7-48AF-B133-94980AFCE46A@dsl-only.net> <20150115231129.1b28c8d0@zhabar.attlocal.net> <0631235D-A505-4C37-87D7-6F46A14552AB@dsl-only.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:08:17 -0800
Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> An oddity of the patch is dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm is almost
> always zero when sampled: (This was during the "make -j 8 buildworld
> buildkernel" sort of test.)
> 
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 3197
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 3199
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 3197
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 278
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> dev.smu.0.fans.cpu_a_exhaust.rpm: 0
> 
> The b_exhaust and the intakes and the a_pump look more reasonable.
> 
> ===
> Mark Millard
> markmi at dsl-only.net
> 

I think that might be simply a timing issue.  I haven't seen any
problems testing on my dual G5.  How does the temperature look now?
Do you still have overheating problems?

I have an updated patch available at
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1549 , which is what I'm testing on my
machine.

- Justin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150116233145.6708cc6f>