Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:36:37 +0000 From: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Could mount_msdosfs be less cryptic and more compatible with fsck_msdosfs? Message-ID: <20150118003637.GB94793@in-addr.com> In-Reply-To: <54BAE6DE.3050206@FreeBSD.org> References: <54BAE6DE.3050206@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:49:02AM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > > I could not mount FAT32 image, but "fsck_msdosfs" says, that it is > valid, good FAT32 image. > > % sudo fsck_msdosfs /dev/md0 > ** /dev/md0 > ** Phase 1 - Read and Compare FATs > ** Phase 2 - Check Cluster Chains > ** Phase 3 - Checking Directories > ** Phase 4 - Checking for Lost Files > 7 files, 96256 free (188 clusters) > % sudo mount -t msdosfs /dev/md0 /mnt > mount_msdosfs: /dev/md0: Invalid argument > % > > I don't know what should I do to mount this image. > > I'm using 10-STABLE. Did you check dmesg? Sometimes filesystems give more detail in kernel logs than is possible through error codes. Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150118003637.GB94793>