Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:01:27 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip runs into "permission denied" Message-ID: <20150118130127.71b8cba9@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1501181210570.2527@tuna.site> References: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1501181210570.2527@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:18:27 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: > The ports q/a framework has been suggesting this for a while, so > I added INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip to lang/gcc5/Makefile. > > Using install-strip for vanilla GCC builds (from source, outside > the FreeBSD Ports framework) works just fine. > > In the context of Ports this runs into a permission problem since > install sets binaries to r-x, at which point strip then fails. > > Here is the build log: > > install -m 555 fixinc.sh .../prefix/gcc5/libexec/gcc5/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.1/5.0.0/install-tools/fixinc.sh > install -s -m 555 fixincl .../prefix/gcc5/libexec/gcc5/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.1/5.0.0/install-tools/fixincl > install -m 555 mkheaders .../prefix/gcc5/libexec/gcc5/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.1/5.0.0/install-tools/mkheaders > test -z 'strip' || strip .../prefix/gcc5/libexec/gcc5/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.1/5.0.0/install-tools/fixincl > strip: unable to copy file '.../prefix/gcc5/libexec/gcc5/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.1/5.0.0/install-tools/fixincl'; reason: Permission denied > Makefile:191: recipe for target 'install-strip' failed > gmake[3]: *** [install-strip] Error 1 This strip command seems redundant. Isn't fixincl already stripped by the "install -s" command above? What does this piece of the log look like outside the ports framework?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150118130127.71b8cba9>