Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:18:35 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists@toco-domains.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poudriere Timeout Message-ID: <20150119191834.GH83169@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <54BD3203.5050809@toco-domains.de> References: <201501190145.t0J1jKvg006268@slippy.cwsent.com> <54BCF7C9.7090502@toco-domains.de> <20150119154822.GX44537@home.opsec.eu> <54BD3203.5050809@toco-domains.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > >> Yes, i have. I've solved this problem by moving the build-jails of > >> poudriere to an memory disk. This make poudriere no longer io-bund and > >> incredibly fast. And solve this issue ;) > > How did you do this ? I want to try this myself 8-} > I've hacked poudriere to run within a jail. Aha, the .m mountpoint. My test host has 32 GB, so 20 GB should not be a problem. Testport: www/p5-Selenium-Remote-Driver on 10.1-amd64, 9.3-amd64 and 8.4-i386. Results: old: 00:05:43 new: 00:05:11 old: 00:01:56 new: 00:00:12 old: 00:02:11 new: 00:00:14 Nice! -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150119191834.GH83169>