Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:41:29 -1000 From: parv <parv@pair.com> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: perl 5.21.7 - test fail of cpan/IO-Socket-IP/t/01local-client-v4.t Message-ID: <20150123164129.GA56502@holstein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <CB5B48B5581817678EE0ED38@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <20150122063853.GA3463@holstein.holy.cow> <CB5B48B5581817678EE0ED38@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <CB5B48B5581817678EE0ED38@atuin.in.mat.cc>, wrote Mathieu Arnold thusly... > > +--On 21 janvier 2015 20:38:53 -1000 parv <parv@pair.com> wrote: > | Has anybody noticed the test failure (in perl 5.21.7) related to > | socket address in cpan/IO-Socket-IP/t/01local-client-v4.t when > | multiple aliases exist for 127.0.0.1 ... ... > Also, it looks like the test says it can fail because of strange > networking. Have you tried reporting this upstream ? I had not as I wanted to be sure that failure was not due to local network configuration ... > | # ifconfig lo0 > | lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384 > | options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM> > | inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd > | inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > | inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > | inet 127.0.0.2 netmask 0xffffff00 > | inet 127.0.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 > | inet 127.0.0.4 netmask 0xffffff00 > | nd6 options=3<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV> > > As a side note, your netmask is wrong, which may be why the test > fails, 127/8 is the network, not 127/24. ... which apparently was the case! After setting the netmask to /8, tests PASSED (for perl 5.20 & 5.21.8). Thank you. Now, I would try to understand the code that acquires the socket address to find out why the address was 0x7f000002 earlier. - parv --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150123164129.GA56502>