Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:14:32 +0000
From:      Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>
Cc:        fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: This diskfailure should not panic a system, but just disconnect disk from ZFS
Message-ID:  <20150620221431.GB26416@mouf.net>
In-Reply-To: <5585767B.4000206@digiware.nl>
References:  <5585767B.4000206@digiware.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Found my system rebooted this morning:
> 
> Jun 20 05:28:33 zfs kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff8011b6da498: Listen
> queue overflow: 8 already in queue awaiting acceptance (48 occurrences)
> Jun 20 05:28:33 zfs kernel: panic: I/O to pool 'zfsraid' appears to be
> hung on vdev guid 18180224580327100979 at '/dev/da0'.
> Jun 20 05:28:33 zfs kernel: cpuid = 0
> Jun 20 05:28:33 zfs kernel: Uptime: 8d9h7m9s
> Jun 20 05:28:33 zfs kernel: Dumping 6445 out of 8174
> MB:..1%..11%..21%..31%..41%..51%..61%..71%..81%..91%
> 
> Which leads me to believe that /dev/da0 went out on vacation, leaving
> ZFS into trouble.... But the array is:
> ----
> NAME               SIZE  ALLOC   FREE  EXPANDSZ   FRAG    CAP  DEDUP
> zfsraid           32.5T  13.3T  19.2T         -     7%    41%  1.00x
> ONLINE  -
>   raidz2          16.2T  6.67T  9.58T         -     8%    41%
>     da0               -      -      -         -      -      -
>     da1               -      -      -         -      -      -
>     da2               -      -      -         -      -      -
>     da3               -      -      -         -      -      -
>     da4               -      -      -         -      -      -
>     da5               -      -      -         -      -      -
>   raidz2          16.2T  6.67T  9.58T         -     7%    41%
>     da6               -      -      -         -      -      -
>     da7               -      -      -         -      -      -
>     ada4              -      -      -         -      -      -
>     ada5              -      -      -         -      -      -
>     ada6              -      -      -         -      -      -
>     ada7              -      -      -         -      -      -
>   mirror           504M  1.73M   502M         -    39%     0%
>     gpt/log0          -      -      -         -      -      -
>     gpt/log1          -      -      -         -      -      -
> cache                 -      -      -      -      -      -
>   gpt/raidcache0   109G  1.34G   107G         -     0%     1%
>   gpt/raidcache1   109G   787M   108G         -     0%     0%
> ----
> 
> And thus I'd would have expected that ZFS would disconnect /dev/da0 and
> then switch to DEGRADED state and continue, letting the operator fix the
> broken disk.
> Instead it chooses to panic, which is not a nice thing to do. :)
> 
> Or do I have to high hopes of ZFS?
> 
> Next question to answer is why this WD RED on:
> 
> arcmsr0@pci0:7:14:0:    class=0x010400 card=0x112017d3 chip=0x112017d3
> rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
>     vendor     = 'Areca Technology Corp.'
>     device     = 'ARC-1120 8-Port PCI-X to SATA RAID Controller'
>     class      = mass storage
>     subclass   = RAID
> 
> got hung, and nothing for this shows in SMART....
> 

You may be hitting the zfs deadman panic, which is triggered when the
controller hangs. This can in some cases be caused by disks that die in unusual
ways.
 
> > (If needed vmcore available) > 

The backtrace might confirm or dispute my theory.

Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150620221431.GB26416>