Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:36:28 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Jan Mikkelsen <janm@transactionware.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.2-BETA1: pw(8) does not support "pw useradd name -u 0" Message-ID: <20150713083628.GA37597@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <00BBEBAC-D7E2-4312-995B-93F7F0EDDD42@transactionware.com> References: <00BBEBAC-D7E2-4312-995B-93F7F0EDDD42@transactionware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:57:32PM +1000, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our system build scripts we have this command:
>
> /usr/sbin/pw -V $d useradd toor -u 0 -g 0 -d /root -s /bin/sh -c "Bourne-again Superuser" -g wheel -o
>
> After 10.2-BETA1, the toor account is being added with UID 1001 instead of UID 0. This looks like a problem with line 754 in pw_user.c, which has this test:
>
> /*
> * Check the given uid, if any
> */
> if (id > 0) {
> uid = (uid_t) id;
>
> if ((pwd = GETPWUID(uid)) != NULL && conf.checkduplicate)
> errx(EX_DATAERR, "uid `%u' has already been allocated", pwd->pw_uid);
> } else {
> struct bitmap bm;
>
>
> The (id > 0) test should probably be (id >= 0) to allow “-u 0” to be passed on the command line.
>
> This change is from r285092 by bapt@. Was this change in behaviour intentional?
Nope, I'll fix asap
Thanks for reporting
Best regards,
Bapt
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlWjeIwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExPHQCeJEVB1w5N/1POLy5KzbyD8jnG
ljIAoIDz/2L2J1dj1aqwUXW5CEFPk6tU
=dMJh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150713083628.GA37597>