Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:08:37 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: mexas@bris.ac.uk, henk@signature.nl, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time Message-ID: <20150820150837.GL50943@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201508200724.t7K7OPaQ033554@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:32:07AM +0100 I heard the voice of Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: > > I'm not exactly sure what you're all complaining about. The port > just works fine, it does take a few seconds for make to iterate over > all options, but it's because the port has way too many options. It's a pretty sizable difference... % svn co -r394572 [ Mk, print] % cd print/ghostscript9 % time make -V MAINTAINER doceng@FreeBSD.org 0.903u 0.023s 0:00.92 100.0% 834+264k 82+0io 6pf+0w % ( cd ../../Mk && svn up -r394573 ) Updating '.': U bsd.options.mk U bsd.port.mk Updated to revision 394573. % time make -V MAINTAINER doceng@FreeBSD.org 81.908u 0.070s 1:21.99 99.9% 848+264k 82+0io 5pf+0w And how many times is make(1) gonna have to parse up the makefile and friends when you're running portmaster or poudriere? -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150820150837.GL50943>