Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:40:52 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Ashish SHUKLA <ashish@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Matthieu Volat <mazhe@alkumuna.eu>, ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.02 (was: Re: [CFT] net-im/ejabberd to 16.01) Message-ID: <20160308174052.GI35640@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <86twkhkmxg.fsf_-_@chateau.d.if> References: <86h9gs26l0.fsf@chateau.d.if> <20160228193353.0b62c06b@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <864mcs1g9p.fsf@chateau.d.if> <CEC1F737-32E1-478D-A3AB-3473BF14B28F@alkumuna.eu> <86d1rfehpi.fsf@chateau.d.if> <20160305180935.1eff68ff@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <86io0yzsfs.fsf@chateau.d.if> <20160307201946.0964505f@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <86twkhkmxg.fsf_-_@chateau.d.if>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I have updated my diff to install the file at the expected location. Other > changes in this update is cleanup, and updation of dependencies tarball. Please, may I suggest you test the resulting port with portlint -AC ? There are a few issues, among them the exec/unexec in the pkg-plist, which nowadays can be cleaned up with @sample. See: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#plist-keywords-sample For the really tricky patch-.. file, what about using the EXTRA_PATCHES contruct instead ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160308174052.GI35640>