Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:26:07 +0200 From: Andrzej Tobola <ato@iem.pw.edu.pl> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk Message-ID: <20160513072607.GB17437@volt.iem.pw.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <d857274b-908a-4873-1f81-ea99cb1fdbba@freebsd.org> References: <d857274b-908a-4873-1f81-ea99cb1fdbba@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:11:47AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > This patch is pretty self explanatory. > > it allows us to keep patches for various ports separately in a sparse > hierarchy while not having to write to the ports tree itself. > > In case the list scrubs hte text attachment (diff) here's the > description part of the diff. >From a long time I am using unionfs - it simpler and allows also to modyfy/mask all port files - e.g: mount -t nullfs -o ro /pub/FreeBSD/SVN/ports /usr/ports mount -t unionfs -o ro /usr/local/ports /usr/ports -a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160513072607.GB17437>