Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 20:57:01 +0200 From: Julien Cigar <julien@perdition.city> To: Chris Watson <bsdunix44@gmail.com> Cc: Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAST + ZFS + NFS + CARP Message-ID: <20160630185701.GD5695@mordor.lan> In-Reply-To: <678321AB-A9F7-4890-A8C7-E20DFDC69137@gmail.com> References: <20160630144546.GB99997@mordor.lan> <71b8da1e-acb2-9d4e-5d11-20695aa5274a@internetx.com> <AD42D8FD-D07B-454E-B79D-028C1EC57381@gmail.com> <20160630153747.GB5695@mordor.lan> <63C07474-BDD5-42AA-BF4A-85A0E04D3CC2@gmail.com> <678321AB-A9F7-4890-A8C7-E20DFDC69137@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Chris Watson wrote: >=20 >=20 > Sent from my iPhone 5 >=20 > >=20 > >>=20 > >> Yes that's another option, so a zpool with two mirrors (local +=20 > >> exported iSCSI) ? > >=20 > > Yes, you would then have a real time replication solution (as HAST), co= mpared to ZFS send/receive which is not. > > Depends on what you need :) > >=20 > >>=20 > >>> ZFS would then know as soon as a disk is failing. >=20 > So as an aside, but related, for those watching this from the peanut gall= ery and for the benefit of the OP perhaps those that run with this setup mi= ght give some best practices and tips here in this thread on making this a = good reliable setup. I can see someone reading this thread and tossing two = crappy Ethernet cards in a box and then complaining it doesn't work well.= =20 It would be more than welcome indeed..! I have the feeling that HAST isn't that much used (but maybe I am wrong) and it's difficult to find=20 informations on it's reliability and concrete long-term use cases... Also the pros vs cons of HAST vs iSCSI >=20 > Perhaps those doing this could listed recommended NICs so write performan= ce of the slave over the network isn't slow as sin, or their relevant part = of their config scripts to get this running well, any sysctl's set to boost= performance, gotcha's you e seen using this setup, and if a mirror failed = were you happy with this. India during recovery? Anything that will help cu= rrent and future folks stumbling across this thread I think would be a big = help in getting this good idea used a little more widely.=20 >=20 > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXdWt6AAoJELK7NxCiBCPA4mgQAKWuRRHmT1irM05jCF8sf/0J OlVfiF1cRnMHQSHXyehD56sSAYx0cszsFAWNANuVXoDX5YHdz5VRRWAZl5mZkB2N hxMbW5SiHUON9u7oIJq8/dfQ5SI2JF6Hk8nZ72K/NdFqKB02RHyyyMo+0306WtEe PPDKiU+T+VRpbDb7H5v/swclxbp4J8tw6qDxyofM2FUxg4hsW2yKIB9NfHqcVM+j iwruGBetMTdzFrxyTXZX2NmnYfW1Q7GhxFmq49/jKQoG810P2pN35F1jaPsO7Nlm Pnr8arLpIscRoDHumkMSXkxDMkueuKBjvlIvAhEy2mRkC9S9Dpr3Fqdbt5Ea9aiG FIIUcECKeW0iZsMOIIfFHUEbp+JJDHehycuezvyz1HuOe01qK1n6mxB0QxLq4kKB ro23h6uVAE1hrz29bpud9u7C1k5WRhghjAQHQHo+xXEU/vsnP4UAYtUHkmKstsXH 0uspiPHI/EqiJXZfu2a16YNxxdhZr1a8nyTFbczR0PqHSrlimhVmMn3JuhPPlhLG osQ54E/2nDXxiPiB6AdG97A9SLUr8eA/BZgSkbgx0vSnVKqeT1NIafP90DXkBEFT ZdrwgljXahB+XXiuhlW9pX76NNk3vnohptr2sjdp88Ce3A1tsw0YdeP4OyO6CKS6 fSEUSh3cuQBLzP14rjkn =P4A4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160630185701.GD5695>