Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:49:13 +0200
From:      Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To:        Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
Subject:   Re: Best way to exterminate a port
Message-ID:  <20160712054913.GF95302@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ5xbBUEokq8qRgNee4vTd0UVojfBzLt_K9ZNrNHiyrNMg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20160712002734.GE33486@www.zefox.net> <20160712052219.GE95302@home.opsec.eu> <CAOjFWZ5xbBUEokq8qRgNee4vTd0UVojfBzLt_K9ZNrNHiyrNMg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

> > > Is there an easy way to "rip out by the roots" a botched
> > > port install and start over, including re-doing all the
> > > configuration dialogs of the port and its dependencies?
> >
> > For one port:
> >
> > pkg delete port
> >
> > cd /usr/ports/<...>
> >
> > make rmconfig
> 
> Isn't there an "rmconfig-recursive" target?

Thanks, I was not aware of that.

> And doesn't pkg delete have -r or -R for recursively deleting dependencies?

man pkg-delete has

   -R
                Delete all packages that require the listed packages as well.

So it looks that this does something else ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years to go !



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160712054913.GF95302>