Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:49:37 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: OS version upgrade detected. Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended Message-ID: <201607131449.u6DEnbsJ065787@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi ports@
With:
uname -a
FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT \
#1 r302560M: Wed Jul 13 01:28:27 CEST 2016 \
jhs@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64
cd /usr/ports; svn up
Updating '.':
At revision 418418
make fetch
pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected. \
Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended
This is an incomplete thus bad reccomendation, based on a false
assumption all users of ports/ only want packages. It's quite obvious
from "make fetch" that here one wants to fetch distfiles to recompile,
not install binary packages, the warning should at least also provide
an alternate recipe for ports/ source based users who want to
recompile whatever to get rid of warning.
What causes the warning ? a grep of Mk/* doesnt show it,
It's presumably coming from Mk/ calling some pkg ?
In /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg ? I fail to grep for Major
What text can we add to which Mk/* to state the source upgrade route ?
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.eu/jhs/
Mail plain text, No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, MS.doc.
Prefix old lines '> ' Reply below old, like play script. Break lines by 80.
http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201607131449.u6DEnbsJ065787>