Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:27:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> To: 000.fbsd@quip.cz Cc: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: ports-mgmt/poudriere Message-ID: <201608292327.u7TNRRxS015120@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <57C4B7F3.4040003@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 Aug, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to report one "dangerous" problem with "poudriere ports -d"
> command. There should be a "-p treename" but if it is omitted, poudriere
> deletes tree "default"
>
> This is my error, I know, but I think poudrier should print a warning or
> do not assume I wanted delete "default"
>
> root@sm-reserve ~/# poudriere ports -d headtest
> [00:00:00] ====>> Deleting portstree "default" done
>
> It should be
>
> root@sm-reserve ~/# poudriere ports -d -p headtest
> [00:00:00] ====>> Deleting portstree "headtest" done
Yeah, that bit me too. The poudriere man page even says:
Except for -l, all of the subcommands require the -p switch (see
below).
Even worse in my case, it deleted a ports tree that was not even created
by poudriere. My default ports tree is actually /usr/ports and I hooked
it into poudrire by doing something like:
poudriere ports -c -p default -F -M /usr/ports
IMHO, if the ports tree was not created by poudriere, then -k should be
the default when deleting it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201608292327.u7TNRRxS015120>