Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:07:11 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Kajetan Staszkiewicz <vegeta@tuxpowered.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 60G+ network connection Message-ID: <20160902140711.GC34394@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <6699041.g38mlsGLrS@energia> References: <20160901211825.GG88122@zxy.spb.ru> <224082ab-95f5-0935-6429-7e7a612f1312@selasky.org> <20160902100203.GK88122@zxy.spb.ru> <6699041.g38mlsGLrS@energia>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:02:20PM +0200, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote: > On day piątek, 2 września 2016 13:02:03 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > > PS: 100G transmiters and connectiveti too expensive, 2x40G prefer. > > > > > > You can put 2x 40GBit/s modules in the CX-4. I'm not sure if you can > > > combine 2x 40GBit/s into a single 80GBit/s. > > > > I can do it by if_lagg. > > Plase note that by using link aggregation you can not achieve full speed over > a single TCP stream. Onle when multiple streams are in operation you will > really get the aggregated speed. NP, I am have more then 40K TCP stream. PS: link aggregation with round-roubin policy can achieve full speed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160902140711.GC34394>