Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:43:26 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client Message-ID: <20170105104326.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> References: <c798f1e9-92f0-1d2a-32e4-46dad59f05d0@FreeBSD.org> <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! [openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc] > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set > the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary > packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see > removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the > complexity. The other question is: What's the use of SASL anyway ? I've seen it for years in mailserver setups, etc, and it always caused trouble. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170105104326.GB2648>