Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 17:24:37 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster? Message-ID: <20171001172437.32f4a2c1@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <5813dd8ee208549f2a96672723d47532@acheronmedia.com> References: <81D84A650858BA40BF6936408052E6BC0138263988@msgdb11.utad.utoledo.edu> <k20i-pniy-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20170929182305.GE86601@home.opsec.eu> <20170929183448.GA175@gmail.com> <77334fc4-b64e-45ed-a443-4076e47acee3@BY2NAM03FT029.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com> <BN6PR2001MB173012B1DBBC7BB0A900DAA2807E0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <COL004-MC4F55p68V8z000ac00b@COL004-MC4F55.hotmail.com> <BN6PR2001MB17309E4F64000C0C00DA086D807F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <CAN6yY1ukz_gn3Ny4J52qoq0KjGmvDxLEZrBenXPA7o-YC%2BHSyg@mail.gmail.com> <b7e9e82e-f657-3c6a-a96a-f0ee486f12f5@FreeBSD.org> <5813dd8ee208549f2a96672723d47532@acheronmedia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 12:26:25 +0200 Vlad K. wrote: > Another problem is poudriere's inability to reuse already installed > packages, if they're a dependency for something being built by it. > Personally I'd never use that option, as I want clean, isolated > rebuilds of everything affected, but I can understand how quick > building of one or two packages could use already installed deps, if > people wanted that (and break any promise of integrity facilitated > with isolated builds). Do you mean as opposed to installing the dependencies from the repository, or are you saying that it rebuilds them?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171001172437.32f4a2c1>