Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 15:42:55 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> To: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= <marko.cupac@mimar.rs> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VLANing between jails not segmenting traffic Message-ID: <20171102154255.12ca7e4d@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20171102131931.452f1106@efreet-freebsd.kappastar.com> References: <4d50ef1e-1cc2-aca2-d390-313ef824d524@gmail.com> <59F79902.40408@grosbein.net> <2A44422B-31A9-4ADC-8FCE-D1F8BC03623C@freebsd.org> <20171102131931.452f1106@efreet-freebsd.kappastar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:19:31 +0100 Marko Cupa=C4=87 <marko.cupac@mimar.rs> wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:46:35 +0100 > Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > > You can use fibs with net.add_addr_allfibs=3D0 to get separate routing > > tables (comes with its own set of complications though). =20 >=20 > I hoped to go this way, but the fact that host (in fib0) replies to > icmp requests destined to jail with raw_sockets disabled (in fib 1) > via host's default gateway, making really wierd routing situation. Shouldn't you be able to fix this using a pf pass rule with rtable? Maybe you can share more of your setup, quite curious. -m >=20 > Had to go back to separate physical hosts for now. Will check VIMAGE. --=20 Michael Gmelin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171102154255.12ca7e4d>