Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:26:15 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Farhan Khan <khanzf@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) Message-ID: <20171123152615.GA35498@rdtc.ru> In-Reply-To: <26834e84-cd88-cafb-ea0a-3d03572bf252@gmail.com> References: <e5f7b57242353030618d34bc1ad445a9@udns.ultimatedns.net> <a5ea7585-2401-ee21-b2e1-391789742008@johnea.net> <20171123030402.GA79380@night.db.net> <26834e84-cd88-cafb-ea0a-3d03572bf252@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:49:13AM -0500, Farhan Khan wrote: > Hi all, > > I suggest removing fortune(6) from base. It is essentially a tweak and > best left for FreeBSD derivatives (GhostBSD, TrueOS, etc), not something > for base. It seems inappropriate for servers. fortune(6) is very useful for workstations. And FreeBSD does very well as workstation. Please do not dictate how one should use FreeBSD. Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171123152615.GA35498>