Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:25:22 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <20171209012522.GA42506@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091013310.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> References: <fb3d23c5-e32d-452a-a0c3-c3cb12340054@cloudzeeland.nl> <a66d1c33-e405-d9e8-d9c3-2738b5e66887@cloudzeeland.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712080956580.41281@wonkity.com> <20171208180905.GA96560@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091013310.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:16:54AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > replace it with dma(1). > > There is? Is there anything else that they're going to spring on us? > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712.html FreeBSD use to pride itself on being a complete (unix-like) operating system out-of-box. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171209012522.GA42506>