Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 Dec 2017 11:42:34 -0800
From:      John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
To:        Igor Mozolevsky <mozolevsky@gmail.com>
Cc:        RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>, freebsd security <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: http subversion URLs should be discontinued in favor of https URLs
Message-ID:  <20171210194234.GJ5901@funkthat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADWvR2jxCH=-VTY1W3wzFhzo8mWSjZqeVpVrCQFNobZepWbqKg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <5A2709F6.8030106@grosbein.net> <11532fe7-024d-ba14-0daf-b97282265ec6@rawbw.com> <8788fb0d-4ee9-968a-1e33-e3bd84ffb892@heuristicsystems.com.au> <20171205220849.GH9701@gmail.com> <20171205231845.5028d01d@gumby.homeunix.com> <CADWvR2gVn8H5h6LYB5ddwUHYwDtiLCuYndsXhJywi7Q9vNsYvw@mail.gmail.com> <20171210173222.GF5901@funkthat.com> <CADWvR2iGQOtcU=FnU-fNsso2eLCCQn=swnOLoqws%2B33V8VzX1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20171210190257.GH5901@funkthat.com> <CADWvR2jxCH=-VTY1W3wzFhzo8mWSjZqeVpVrCQFNobZepWbqKg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Igor Mozolevsky wrote this message on Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 19:17 +0000:
> On 10 December 2017 at 19:02, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Igor Mozolevsky wrote this message on Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 17:39 +0000:
> > > On 10 December 2017 at 17:32, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > The discussion has been for svn updates over http, not for
> > freebsd-update
> > > > updates which are independantly signed and verified..  There is
> > currently
> > > > no signatures provided via SVN to validate any source received via
> > http.
> > >
> > > There has been no instance of in-transit compromise reported since SVN
> > was
> > > introduced.
> >
> > So, you require an exploit in the wild before you'll patch?
> 
> No, I'm saying it's not a realistic threat model! If the threat is the
> integrity of the source code in transit, then it'd be way cheaper and way
> more reasonable to implement a Merkle Tree-like verification with each
> revision.

Then you should be fine w/ http for banking sites, since it's not realistic
that your ISP will MITM your connection to steal money from you, right?
I don't know of a single instance of an ISP MITM'ing banking transactions
to steal money.

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171210194234.GJ5901>