Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:51:31 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Stephen Cook <sclists@gmail.com> Cc: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, deb@freebsdfoundation.org, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has a politics problem Message-ID: <20180305205130.GA3332@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <769a3928-0571-255a-3bb2-b6069c7dbf33@gmail.com> References: <201803050114.w251Dv53087353@fire.js.berklix.net> <bf158178-ef20-5165-da34-839c1df79ca6@FreeBSD.org> <769a3928-0571-255a-3bb2-b6069c7dbf33@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:48:26PM -0500, Stephen Cook wrote: > The problem with the Foundation sponsoring a CoC is that a small group > of extremists forced their way in to generate and implement their own > set of rules, secretly. This is exactly not what happened. > I suspect from the lack of response to my earlier question that I > accidentally paid for this when I thought I was donating to help develop > an OS. An alternate explanation is that people are tired of going through every sentence of every post about this, word by word, and trying to respond in a way that cannot possibly be misconstrued. tl:dr; your conclusion is wrong. I myself have neither the time nor motivation to respond to every single message on this subject; it's demotivating. I suspect most of the posters have already made up their minds, in any case. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180305205130.GA3332>