Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:57:07 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports Message-ID: <20180414165707.GA83446@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <BN6PR2001MB1730DAE90491E510EDED691F80B20@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> References: <a9ce1576-a254-4e79-3e50-b90d49827a1e@freebsd.org> <BN6PR2001MB1730DAE90491E510EDED691F80B20@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 02:30:09PM +0000, Carmel NY wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:18:22 +0200, Stefan Esser stated:
>
> {truncated}
>
> >This is another case (after the implementation of FLAVOR support that does
> >not seem well-designed and causes lots of effort and inefficiencies in port
> >management tools like portmaster), which makes me consider giving up my
> >efforts to keep portmaster alive.
>
> Have you tried using "synth"?
This discussion occurred with the introduction of FLAVORS,
which broken all ports management tools except poudriere.
--
Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180414165707.GA83446>