Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:53:30 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> To: RW via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: audiophile sound on FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <20180425185330.70fb9b1e.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> In-Reply-To: <20180424235410.5e175bc6@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20180423224242.7299f430@WorkMachine> <20180424113308.52f35f93@WorkMachine> <20180424200924.12c648bf@archlinux> <20180424235410.5e175bc6@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:21:31 +0100 RW via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 20:09:24 +0200 > Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions wrote: > > > > Btw. an "audio CD" already provides not that good audio quality. > > What you need for high end audio quality are 48 KHz, > > I'd be astonished if you could tell the difference under double blind > conditions - even if you are a child. despite knowing the theories behind 'digital' sound, I can tell you out of own experience that there is a huge difference between 'analog' sound and 'digital' when money is not an issue. I am not able to tell you why 'digital' sound is so bad. A friend of mine has real good 'analog' sound equipment. After noticing that he has an original LP of a CD of mine, we plugged normal digital equipment in. Every child could hear the difference. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180425185330.70fb9b1e.freebsd.ed.lists>