Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:52:05 +0100 From: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is unionfs usable on -CURRENT? Message-ID: <20180606135204.GA44323@in-addr.com> In-Reply-To: <3a040dd0-5017-755a-1ce4-bc855146c404@FreeBSD.org> References: <3a040dd0-5017-755a-1ce4-bc855146c404@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 04:14:35PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > "man mount_unionfs" is very scary. Is is still true? Maybe, here are > some other workarounds to have one directory with static data on R/O FS > and transient data on R/W FS? > > Unfortunately, "net-mgmt/unifi5" want to put all working data directly > to its installation directory, which resides on R/O FS of NanoBSD image. I believe the warnings are still at least partly true. The usual suggestion is to use "mount -o union" instead of "mount -t unionfs". "mount -o union" doesn't have the unionfs issues Regards, Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180606135204.GA44323>