Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 13:55:40 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> Cc: avg@freebsd.org, eric@vangyzen.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd@hda3.com, mike@sentex.net, truckman@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ryzen issues on FreeBSD ? (with sort of workaround) Message-ID: <20180701105540.GX2430@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <E1fZZOe-0001FU-I7@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> References: <20180630165508.GT2430@kib.kiev.ua> <E1fZZOe-0001FU-I7@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > This should be the kernel patch equivalent to the script. > > Ah, thankyou. I shall give this a try on tuesday when I am > physically back in front of the machine. I have been trying without > the oath as you asked by the way, and with the latest microcode > update (0x8001137) it also seems stable, without these tweaks. But I > havent stressed it too much - if the errata says to set the bits then > we should set the bits. It is very likely that the latest microcode sets the chicken bits for the known erratas already. AFAIK, this is the best that a ucode update can typically do anyway.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180701105540.GX2430>