Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:58:02 -0700 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: John Kennedy <warlock@phouka.net> Cc: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org>, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Subject: Re: RPI3 swap experiments ["was killed: out of swap space" with: "v_free_count: 5439, v_inactive_count: 1"] Message-ID: <20180809175802.GA32974@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <20180809033735.GJ30738@phouka1.phouka.net> References: <201808010405.w7145RS6086730@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <6BFE7B77-A0E2-4FAF-9C68-81951D2F6627@yahoo.com> <20180802002841.GB99523@www.zefox.net> <20180802015135.GC99523@www.zefox.net> <EC74A5A6-0DF4-48EB-88DA-543FD70FEA07@yahoo.com> <20180806155837.GA6277@raichu> <20180808153800.GF26133@www.zefox.net> <20180808204841.GA19379@raichu> <2DC1A479-92A0-48E6-9245-3FF5CFD89DEF@yahoo.com> <20180809033735.GJ30738@phouka1.phouka.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:37:35PM -0700, John Kennedy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 02:02:36PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: > > ... My understanding is that some other folks involved in the message > > exchange replicated the OOM kills without having evidence of issues > > like Bob P. has with large latencies for his hardware. The latencies > > may be sufficient but not necessary. > > > > Getting some of the other folks to run your tests would likely be > > good. ... > > Sounds like anyone else running tests should also have all 3 > > changes in place. > > > > I've CC'd some folks from the exchange that I think were running > > some tests. > > My system is almost done crunching. Applying patches and tweaks is fine, but > I think Bob P has some other reporting tweaks going that we'd want to replicate > so we have more than a fail/no fail. > I've gathered up what I've been given and put it in http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/swaptests/tools/ in hopes it'll be useful. One thing I haven't figured out is how to organize the test result tree in a simple way. At this point it's /revision/swapconfig/patch1/patch2/.../... but that gets very messy fast, and ambiguous if folks don't standarize terminology (swap configs in particular). > I tend to be in the no-fail, which is more data I guess. I also have a much > older (slower) SD card that I could put back into service and see if that > tweaks me a more towards the maybe-fail camp. It seems a worthwhile experiment, but it'll complicate the test tree even more 8-) This _can't_ be a new problem, how do folks deal with it? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180809175802.GA32974>