Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 08:16:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: Matt Churchyard <matt.churchyard@userve.net> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Checking bhyve supported features (sysctls) Message-ID: <201808161516.w7GFGtN1054010@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <3393f8f3d32a4f0890aab87185fbed01@SERVER.ad.usd-group.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hello, > > I'm looking for better ways to check for bhyve support / available features without trying to scan through dmesg output. Yes, it would be very good to remove that, as it usually tries to grep a non-existent file /var/run/dmesg.boot that is not created until after vm_bhyve has been called from /usr/local/etc/rc.d when you have things set to autostartup in /etc/rc.conf > > I notice that the following 2 sysctl's appear to be set to 1 as soon as the vmm module is loaded > > hw.vmm.vmx.initialized: 1 > hw.vmm.vmx.cap.unrestricted_guest: 1 > > Will these be available on both Intel & AMD processors as a way to determine if the module has loaded successfully and can run guests? > > I also see the below sysctl related to iommu. > > hw.vmm.iommu.initialized > > Again, will this be set to 1 as soon as the module is loaded if iommu is supported, or only when it is used? > There also seems to be a vmm.amdvi.enable sysctl. Would both these need checking or is vmm.iommu enough to determine support on any processor. Probalby the safest way for a shell script to decide if bhyve is up and running is to stat /dev/vmm, if that exists then the modules have loaded and initialized and bhyve should be ready to process guests. sysctl's mentiond above would be a poor way to make this determination. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201808161516.w7GFGtN1054010>