Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:38:29 -0700
From:      bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
To:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RPI3 swap experiments (r338342 with vm.pageout_oom_seq="1024" and 6 GB swap)
Message-ID:  <20180906003829.GC818@www.zefox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180901230233.GA42895@www.zefox.net>
References:  <0D8B9A29-DD95-4FA3-8F7D-4B85A3BB54D7@yahoo.com> <FC0798A1-C805-4096-9EB1-15E3F854F729@yahoo.com> <20180813185350.GA47132@www.zefox.net> <FA3B8541-73E0-4796-B2AB-D55CE40B9654@yahoo.com> <20180814014226.GA50013@www.zefox.net> <CANCZdfqFKY3Woa%2B9pVS5hika_JUAUCxAvLznSS4gaLq2kKoWtQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180815013612.GB51051@www.zefox.net> <CANCZdfoB_AcidFpKT_ZmZWUFnmC4Bw55krK%2BMqEmmj=f9KMQ2Q@mail.gmail.com> <20180815225504.GB59074@www.zefox.net> <20180901230233.GA42895@www.zefox.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 04:02:33PM -0700, bob prohaska wrote:
> 
> With r338342  and
> vm.pageout_oom_seq="1024"
> in /boot/loader.conf the RPI3 is a bit closer to a Mars Rover.
> No panics, crashes or USB errors, -j4 buildworld runs to completion.
> When swap usage goes over about 50% the system slows, but doesn't give up.
> There are six 1 GB swap partitions available, 3 on USB and 3 on microSD.
> 
> Log files are at
> http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/swaptests/r338342/
> for the combinations tried so far.
> 

It looks as if using all six GB of swap doesn't cause any immediate problem,
at least so long as swap usage stays relatively low, say 1.5 GB. In a final
test, TRIM was turned on without catastrophe, though it had little to do
given that all the busy filesystems were on USB. The penalty was about one
hour extra (25 vs 24 hours) to run -j4 buildworld from a clean start.

One chance observation caught my attention, however. I'd always thought
the VM system would favor fast swap devices over slow, but the gstat log
recorded this, visible at
http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi3/swaptests/r338342/3gbsd_3gbusb/trim_on/swapscript.log



dT: 10.004s  w: 10.000s
 L(q)  ops/s    r/s   kBps   ms/r    w/s   kBps   ms/w    d/s   kBps   ms/d   %busy Name
    3    175     91    673    4.0     84    701    4.0      0      0    0.0   24.4  mmcsd0
    4    173     88    693  106.6     86    723  176.5      0      0    0.0  103.4  da0
    1     58     30    224    4.5     28    220    4.1      0      0    0.0   14.5  mmcsd0s2b
    3    175     91    673    4.0     84    701    4.0      0      0    0.0   24.7  mmcsd0s2
    1     58     30    223    4.0     28    244    3.8      0      0    0.0   14.0  mmcsd0s2d
    1     59     31    227    3.7     28    237    4.3      0      0    0.0   14.9  mmcsd0s2e
    2     57     28    235  140.2     28    236  103.8      0      0    0.0  186.1  da0a
    0     56     28    224  178.4     28    222   35.9      0      0    0.0  131.5  da0b
    2     59     31    234    9.4     28    240   59.1      0      0    0.0   99.5  da0d
    0      0      0      0    0.0      0      3  15011      0      0    0.0  150.1  da0e
    0      1      0      0    0.0      1     22  13376      0      0    0.0  147.8  da0g
Tue Sep  4 15:07:39 PDT 2018
Device          1K-blocks     Used    Avail Capacity
/dev/da0b         1048576   236872   811704    23%
/dev/mmcsd0s2b    1048576   221568   827008    21%
/dev/da0d         1048576   218636   829940    21%
/dev/da0a         1048576   222028   826548    21%
/dev/mmcsd0s2d    1048576   221660   826916    21%
/dev/mmcsd0s2e    1048576   221392   827184    21%
Total             6291456  1342156  4949300    21%
Sep  4 14:57:52 www sshd[41673]: error: Received disconnect from 103.207.39.197 port 64499:3: com.jcraft.jsch.JSchException: Auth cancel [preauth]
Sep  4 15:04:19 www kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 2217840, size: 12288

The system has lots of fast swap available on microSD, but is seemingly choking 
trying to use the slow swap on da0 _and_ run traffic to /usr and /var. Buildworld
doesn't run any faster with less swap, so I don't think the oversupply is the problem.

Is this expected behavior?  

Thanks for reading,

bob prohaska




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180906003829.GC818>