Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:04:56 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RUN_DEPENDS and portmaster Message-ID: <20180919160456.3eb67f5d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1809191408250.2005@yokozuna.lan> References: <03c14234-538d-fd9f-0c33-22825f3ea91d@fechner.net> <20180910101655.uzyriuylsucz7u3y@ogg.in.absolight.net> <9cf4d06d-e49d-aede-ca8f-b9ad1e9f19af@fechner.net> <957c48fb-bad8-a481-1626-54be15e34993@freebsd.org> <5fc230b9-809e-4501-7375-fe6f0dda2cd6@fechner.net> <04b678b6-c2b8-5f7e-651a-e1dc1fa2fe75@freebsd.org> <201809190911.w8J9BhnY023169@mxdrop307.xs4all.net> <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1809191408250.2005@yokozuna.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, the wise Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > This discussion of portmaster prompts me to ask, what is the status > > of portupgrade? > > > > I used portupgrade at first but subsequently switched to > > portmaster. > > I still use portupgrade daily and it works fine. I presume that's because you use a restricted set of packages. Without flavor support portupgrade can't always get the port directory from the origin. > Afaik the maintainer > is adding support for flavors into portupgrade but I don't know the > status of it: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-December/111445.html That said "in the next few weeks" last year.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180919160456.3eb67f5d>