Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:30:31 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>, multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: drop multimedia@ maintainership on some ports Message-ID: <20190220163031.401cac00@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20190220141225.fskioqhkght6uq5n@ivaldir.net> References: <20190220113842.neue3nmigxfcqul3@ivaldir.net> <o976-d4kw-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20190220134434.7d5oxoi4jfvgxwqw@ivaldir.net> <20190220141225.fskioqhkght6uq5n@ivaldir.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:12:25 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:31:11PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: >>> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>>> I am planning to drop maintainership of some ports actually maintained by >>>> multimedia@ to ports@ in order to give a chance to anyone to jump on it and >>>> maintain them directly if needed. >>> >>> Hmm, I had the opposite reaction from another portmgr@ peer. >>> >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2018-October/189060.html >> >> Interesting I bet we do need to have a portmgr discussion here. > > After discussing with mat we are actually aligned, what mat is describing there > is the default policy for when we do reset maintainership, as it will start > becoming complicated if there was specific policy. But then the team itself can > decide on the fact to actually maintain those or not. Can you review gnome@ ports as well while you're at it? :) They maintain over 500 ports many of which aren't gnome related and almost half are out of date according to portscout.freebsd.org.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190220163031.401cac00>