Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:09:40 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: loose dependency Message-ID: <20190314100939.lsbmlua5hps5mdia@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <20190314.165018.2032001534188262193.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20190314.134014.2127053084940820202.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190314061242.ixvtakqiel4aa4r3@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190314062217.3wx3h2hp74mo3zja@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190314.165018.2032001534188262193.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 04:50:18PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > That is a workaround while increasing maintenance cost. It is at the > maintainer's discretion. Thanks for the advice. Fortunely, icons are not updated too open. The maintenance cost is not negligible but might be acceptable. -- meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190314100939.lsbmlua5hps5mdia>