Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:27:05 -0700 From: John Kennedy <warlock@phouka.net> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sway-1.2_1 crashes Message-ID: <20191010182705.GC46984@phouka1.phouka.net> In-Reply-To: <d0f4-pju3-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <20191007165337.GA85696@phouka1.phouka.net> <wodg-9qj1-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20191007232340.GB85696@phouka1.phouka.net> <20191008172007.GA89365@phouka1.phouka.net> <d0f4-pju3-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:54:28PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > John Kennedy <warlock@phouka.net> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:23:40PM -0700, John Kennedy wrote: > > > >> In any case, this AM, I crunched up the latest 12.1b3 (r353280), upgraded to > >> this mornings ports (since I saw wlroots bump up), made sure about the DRM > >> driver and have been doing a stress test of sorts. In this case, a poudriere > >> run of my ~520 ports and getting my load average up to 12+. Up 2.41 hours > >> so far. Previous record was more in tens of minutes as I was doing stuff. > > > > It made it ~24 hours before I screwed it up (alt-shift-F# console switching). > > Looks more like the keyboard was disabled (tested via caps-lock-light test) vs > > any kind of video problem. Have to try your trick next time. > > VT switching is broken in Sway, see https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/3612 > Other than direct session Sway can use ConsoleKit2 if wlroots is built with > CONSOLEKIT port option enabled. But I don't remember if it helps VT swich issue. ... > Or did you mean X11? If so try xf86-video-intel + bug 236003 patch + SNA enabled. > Maybe Intel didn't push workarounds for old iGPUs from DDX into kernel. Well, that's good to know. I was trying to get swaylock to work, it didn't like my password, so I was going to switch consoles and wack it, but it got my keyboard first. I haven't had an issue on this computer under X11, but I don't guarantee you I was using drm-next as the driver. I fixed it so I can SSH in next time it happens. > i965 unlike iris doesn't use LLVM, so recent LLVM_DEFAULT update should > have no impact on Intel iGPUs. Unless CC/CXX is set by user llvm90 is > mainly used for libraries, not compiler. It was in ports. The mesa stuff gives me a llvm80 dependency, and something along the path to firefox gives me a llvm90. Building things via poudriere so it should be sane and match the regular building processes. I've had a good couple of days without starting firefox. I know GTK3 has some wayland compile options, but firefox seems to depend on both GTK2 (which doesn't) and GTK3 as far as pkg is concerned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20191010182705.GC46984>