Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 17:24:41 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox binary not existing Message-ID: <20200501172441.4e3e8361f5d0e303b131fe0f@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <2EB69D33-65A6-4818-A74E-0DA8605C6516@kukulies.org> References: <FC3D3CCF-609E-4E0A-B766-CF83ED1F91F4@kukulies.org> <c909fcb0-b36f-0ad6-a29e-6fb1ba25e9a0@fastmail.com> <2EB69D33-65A6-4818-A74E-0DA8605C6516@kukulies.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 1 May 2020 18:09:53 +0200 Christoph Kukulies <kuku@kukulies.org> wrote: > I was used to use sh (Bourne sh) under root 21 years ago. So I switched > it back from csh to sh. Wondering why they switched to csh anyway. It is > a tastelessness. ;) Tradition, csh has been a BSD thing forever. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200501172441.4e3e8361f5d0e303b131fe0f>