Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:12:05 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mardorf@riseup.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: proof that Linux is brain damaged Message-ID: <20200904181205.78cbb979@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200904104811.b08f24d8f0397e77cef01cbd@aim.com> References: <CAGBxaXnJmXB5LDvku2r8303571bxgUDEQu8n9HgY3SJ1HJ=YNw@mail.gmail.com> <20200904104811.b08f24d8f0397e77cef01cbd@aim.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:48:11 -0400, Vlad D. Markov wrote: >When criticizing systemd, I think the criticism should be directed at >the distributions forcing its use. Linux doesn't have much to do with >it. Apart from the embedded systems you described, it's probably not wise if a Linux distro diverts from using systemd, since systemd is quasi the standard init system and it's bundled with at least udev. Maintaining a different init system, while maintaining udev or something else from systemd, for usage without systemd, seems to me way to much effort, even when being in favour of Linux. However, if somebody is really that tired of Linux, as the OP is, I wouldn't care about Linux at all, especially not since the OP doesn't need to search for an operating system that fits to his needs. He already seems to be satisfied with FreeBSD, so there's no problem at all.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200904181205.78cbb979>