Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:28:44 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: github ports Message-ID: <20210110192844.abddfcdbe99975b4b15c56f1@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <E79DB347-6EFA-458F-99B2-3E0177FB2AE5@kicp.uchicago.edu> References: <20210110133605.6538dfd5@dismail.de> <CADnZ6B=Yy_fFUtAds3HjKZT10wNhGA6PzkYayc0mLNGoK_ug7Q@mail.gmail.com> <E79DB347-6EFA-458F-99B2-3E0177FB2AE5@kicp.uchicago.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:14:58 -0600 Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > Just for my education: is there any advantage in using git like that > instead of portsnap? With git you get the full history, with portsnap you just get the current (snap) state. If you don't want the history portsnap is almost certainly faster. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210110192844.abddfcdbe99975b4b15c56f1>