Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:03:56 +0100
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pf or ipfw for NAT
Message-ID:  <20210402210356.637a3ed714957fb9c5fdfa3a@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <50dcf18d-f9c3-71c2-abb0-eed8f1b5e192@fjl.co.uk>
References:  <50dcf18d-f9c3-71c2-abb0-eed8f1b5e192@fjl.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 20:17:58 +0100
Frank Leonhardt <freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk> wrote:

> For longer than I care to remember (FreeBSD 2)  I've implemented a 
> physical asymmetric nat gateway using natd and ipfw. I just do what the 
> user guide says and it works.

	Yes it does and that's fine.

> Am I using ipfw/natd for historical reasons? Can I do the same with pf? 

	Yes you can the relevant line in my pf.conf is:

nat on $ext_if inet from !($ext_if) -> ($ext_if:0)

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210402210356.637a3ed714957fb9c5fdfa3a>