Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Apr 2021 09:20:58 +0100
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pf or ipfw for NAT
Message-ID:  <20210403092058.97c46ba70579026e9bd929a1@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <1ff607ca-79cc-3072-831c-54659920e9dc@fjl.co.uk>
References:  <50dcf18d-f9c3-71c2-abb0-eed8f1b5e192@fjl.co.uk> <20210402210356.637a3ed714957fb9c5fdfa3a@sohara.org> <1ff607ca-79cc-3072-831c-54659920e9dc@fjl.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 21:36:04 +0100
Frank Leonhardt <frank2@fjl.co.uk> wrote:

> Thanks Steve. Any idea whether I need to enable the gateway when using 
> pf instead?
> 
> e.g. sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1

	I'm pretty sure you do - TBH I've never tried not setting it on
anything that routes.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210403092058.97c46ba70579026e9bd929a1>