Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 22:16:26 +0000 From: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org> To: jamie@catflap.org, Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com Cc: theraven@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com Subject: Re: Dragonfly Mail Agent (dma) in the base system Message-ID: <202202062216.216MGQgQ005757@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> In-Reply-To: <20220206161102.D8114111@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <835dc887-6491-602c-7d71-d99309871126@siemens.com> <f871dd48-3213-678a-76f8-adcffb1e6772@FreeBSD.org> <20220205141300.C19D2149@slippy.cwsent.com> <202202061553.216Fr0Yt071775@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <20220206161102.D8114111@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> wrote: > In message <202202061553.216Fr0Yt071775@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>, > Jamie La > ndeg-Jones writes: > > Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> wrote: > > > > > dma doesn't support SMTP submission, we may need to review various port > > > default options or whether ports even support it. > > > > Good catch. > > You misquoted me. Read my email again! Sorry, I read it again, but it still looks to me as "some ports only work via SMTP submission, so they will need to be looked at." I suggested an alternative of instead, "emulating" the SMTP submission functionality (but maybe in a better way that my suggested hack, though) After all, it isn't just ports - there could be other third party stuff that only works via submission too. So, to avoid breaking functionality, smtp submission is something to think about continuing supporting, hence my use of the phrase "good catch". Is this not correct? cheers, Jamie > > Would a suitable workaround be to parse the dma.conf file for the SMARTHOST > > address, and then set up a simple tcp proxy on the local submission port to > > that? > > Your comment is based on a false premise.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202202062216.216MGQgQ005757>