Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:10:06 +0200
From:      Julien Cigar <julien@perdition.city>
To:        mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: zfs replication tool
Message-ID:  <20220920141006.n6x6mxpafy3zqpk3@x1>
In-Reply-To: <4cf58433-a13b-9b35-fc3e-8fad6b2ac93d@sentex.net>
References:  <d952d824-bcab-cfef-1b95-a8e71388c588@sentex.net> <20220916134918.hz6glg3nfwr3ouu4@x1> <0a0ba81b-88f2-fa75-9abe-6f41da5d2c69@sentex.net> <20220916140236.jeizzganrtnsrhlo@x1> <20220920092905.3k7qzt7lvhywhcfn@x1> <20220920122029.ufsoyo47qnxtmcqk@x1> <20220920132503.8bfd124b9697d90e474086b3@sohara.org> <20220920125154.n7lcqr3xzhsrylzr@x1> <20220920142314.df043149e82d63cbd289a92e@sohara.org> <4cf58433-a13b-9b35-fc3e-8fad6b2ac93d@sentex.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--rsovht2hlkdqzopa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 09:39:37AM -0400, mike tancsa wrote:
>=20
> On 9/20/2022 9:23 AM, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:51:54 +0200
> > Julien Cigar <julien@perdition.city> wrote:
> >=20
> > > as of 0.5.0 it is possible to transfer properties I think
> > 	Ooh time to RTFM again :)
>=20
> Its kind of a messy problem (properties) and has lots of foot shooting
> possibilities.
>=20
> https://zrepl.github.io/configuration/sendrecvoptions.html?highlight=3Dpr=
operties#job-note-property-replication

I agree, fortunately we have zfs delegations and jailed zfs datasets
which (could) help to mitigate some of those devastating consequences

>=20
> In our case, for our bare metal restoration, we have a separate config fi=
le
> to do restorations per server/vm where there are "special cases". Thankfu=
lly
> there are not many and its all scriptable for restoration.
>=20
> For the A --> B -->C when we do are offload from B to C, we pick the
> snapshots we want to send, place a hold on that snapshot and then do the
> send (1.5 day process). Zrepl cries that it cant prune the snapshot. Once
> the B-C process is complete, we remove the holds and zrepl happily deletes
> the snapshots it thinks its supposed to delete.

I see, is it necessary to place holds manually? I thought zrepl already
does this by default

>=20
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ---Mike
>=20
>=20

--=20
Julien Cigar
PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11  6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0

No trees were killed in the creation of this message.
However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

--rsovht2hlkdqzopa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=amy2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rsovht2hlkdqzopa--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220920141006.n6x6mxpafy3zqpk3>