Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 13:33:28 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> To: Jake Freeland <jake@technologyfriends.net> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is there any plan for ZFS and timerfd updates on stable/14? Message-ID: <20230903133328.54577b85b097da319ecde4ba@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <CAOgZAGaY=NAn9zSWEW4K_mm1z6J0MKKF3McKzsDZEUCgs3gVjA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20230903123028.4ffceb705824f86d2efc21e3@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <CAOgZAGbOGs8-iW7sAPBboO2OM_FNR2TrSpGH3qd1Rf9_qfhMwg@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfr61v7Po28f9mJ-a3ZVnQRArcSdfHw_1tuB3L7iCm04Dw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgZAGaY=NAn9zSWEW4K_mm1z6J0MKKF3McKzsDZEUCgs3gVjA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2 Sep 2023 22:47:53 -0500 Jake Freeland <jake@technologyfriends.net> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 10:40 PM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 2, 2023, 9:36 PM Jake Freeland <jake@technologyfriends.net> > > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 10:31 PM Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> There are discussions about deadlocks issue of ZFS on freebsd-current > >>> ML, starting from [1] last month. > >>> IIRC, at least some fixes (candidates?) are merged to main, but not yet > >>> to stable/14. > >>> > >>> Upcoming (aleready released? or still rc3?) OpenZFS 2.2-release seems > >>> to have most of them. So my 1st question is "Is there any plan to > >>> import vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.2-release into stable/14 BEFORE BRANCHING > >>> releng/14? > >>> > >>> And one more. timerfd is added at last-minutes BEFORE stable/14 is > >>> branched, and already have not-yet-MFC'ed fixes [2], [3], [4] and > >>> Differential revision D41600 on Phablicator [5] related to memory leaks > >>> and locks. > >>> Additionally, splitting out lib32 part to proper place is proposed > >>> as D41640 [6]. Both [5] and [6] are accepted but not yet landed. > >>> Also, D41641 [7] proposes namespace pollution adjustments. This can be > >>> optional? > >>> > >>> Memory leaks and improper locks can lead system to security issues or > >>> deadlocks, so it would be benefical if landed and MFC'ed BEFORE > >>> releng/14 branches. > >>> > >>> Is there any plan to do so? At least, existing deadlocks should be > >>> considered as SHOW-STOPPER and resolved. > >>> > >> > >> The plan is to get all of those patches in before releng/14.0, I believe. > >> > >> What are your thoughts, Warner? > >> > > > > Sounds like the reviews are done or nearly so. I've not had time to look > > closely to be sure... I'd planned on making time Tuesday morning. > > > > Yes. All reviews are good to go. > > Jake Freeland Glad to know. Thanks! Looking forward to see them landed / MFC'ed before releng/14 branches. Regards. > > > > > > Warner > > > > > >> Thanks, > >> Jake Freeland > >> > >> > >>> > >>> I myself am bitten by several deadlocks on poudriere full builds after > >>> upgrading base from stable/13 to stable/14, finally finished with > >>> increasing kern.maxvnodes after powercycle on each deadlock and > >>> continue. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance! > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004162.html > >>> > >>> [2] > >>> > >>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=02f534b57f84d6f4f97c337b05b383c8b3aaf18c > >>> > >>> [3] > >>> > >>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5eab523053db79b4bd4f926c7d7ac04444d9c1da > >>> > >>> [4] > >>> > >>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=f4296cfb409a48de00bfa60e76f686c2b031876f > >>> > >>> [5] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41600 > >>> > >>> [6] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41640 > >>> > >>> [7] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41641 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> -- Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20230903133328.54577b85b097da319ecde4ba>