Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:10:52 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> To: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: LDFLAGS= -pthread situation Message-ID: <20240129201052.3520bea9850f96c9180b3bbc@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <CAFDf7UKLPaWjmK-p5m8y5cj51t5geb=8ur_=JnSpBRQTv2B1dg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFDf7UKLPaWjmK-p5m8y5cj51t5geb=8ur_=JnSpBRQTv2B1dg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:27:02 +0000 Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello all! > > I was updating games/exult-devel and I found that build failed with: > > ld: error: undefined symbol: pthread_create > >>> referenced by LowLevelMidiDriver.cpp > >>> LowLevelMidiDriver.o:(std::__1::thread::thread<int (&)(LowLevelMidiDriver*) <snip> > > > Related to a upstream change about threading support from C++11... > > Using LDFLAGS= -pthread fixed build and it is present in lot of ports. > > My question is if upstream could do anything to avoid this LDFLAGS addition. > This is being discussed at https://github.com/exult/exult/issues/436 > > Any sugestions are welcome! > > Thanks, > > -- > Nuno Teixeira > FreeBSD Committer (ports) Different port, but looks very similar situation with Bug 275950 [1], which I've filed but still not yet triaged (Status: New). [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275950 -- Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20240129201052.3520bea9850f96c9180b3bbc>