Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 03 Aug 2024 05:13:05 +0100
From:      Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, asomers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: ACLs on fusefs
Message-ID:  <202408030413.4734D5gd042998@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2jska_8yG0tf31nEFDQCkQODim8yLBt2qRQ4LbBVc8ZAQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAOtMX2jska_8yG0tf31nEFDQCkQODim8yLBt2qRQ4LbBVc8ZAQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alan Somers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> TLDR;
> how useful would it be if fusefs(4) could support ACLs?

I, personally, don't use ACLs generally, so have not missed them on
fusefs.

However, I do make extensive use of XATTRs, so those are what I've
really missed.

I didn't know xatrs were now supported - is that a new thing, or maybe
the client I use (borgs sshfs implementation) needs to be updated?

Cheers, Jamie



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202408030413.4734D5gd042998>