Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 08:40:19 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> Cc: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>, "current@freebsd.org" <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: powerd forgets top CPU frequency ? Message-ID: <202408250840.47P8eJM8032225@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <1273956903.13647.1724575094919@localhost> References: <202408241706.47OH6LfG023651@critter.freebsd.dk> <AEEBC43B-71F5-4974-87CB-3B05F096B07A@gid.co.uk> <202408250513.47P5DDZF029200@critter.freebsd.dk> <1264471055.10452.1724573369940@localhost> <202408250829.47P8TawP031885@critter.freebsd.dk> <1273956903.13647.1724575094919@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- Ronald Klop writes: > This is interesting by itself. According to the sysctl the CPU only has = 1 frequency to select, which is 2803, but it is running on 3103. Maybe the= re is some = Yes, I've always had a bit of trouble understanding how these things fit t= ogether... (Also not the best laptop I've had in a number of other ways) > other mechanism which influences the CPU freq on your machine. I hope so= mebody else can shine some light on this. > Doesn't the output (or source) of powerd give some insight on why it mak= es the decisions it makes? Only stuff like: load 144%, current freq 3692 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 5606 MHz load 127%, current freq 3692 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 5606 MHz load 120%, current freq 3692 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 5606 MHz load 136%, current freq 3692 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 5606 MHz load 132%, current freq 3692 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 5606 MHz But it is not entirely obvious to me that powerd actually does anything... -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202408250840.47P8eJM8032225>